what the hell is wrong with a bunch of men and women elected by their public constituencies to promote the general welfare and ensure the blessings of liberty who make spurious arguments and promote outright lies about why they are against the vast majority of Americans having access to affordable healthcare?
why is it that the rest of the First World nations (western europe and japan and canada) all believe that and so have decided some 60 years ago that all of their citizens will be better producers of individual wealth if they collectively care for one another by paying through their taxes for:
1) well-funded public education at the primary, secondary, and university level;
2) universal /national public health insurance wherein no one is denied care although there are reasonable waits for some procedures yet one has the option of paying out of pocket for the same procedure to get it faster;
3) affordable and dependable national/public transportation that connects all to all.
Yet the Republicans are against all of them while the Democrats somehow believe that they can cut a deal with big businesses, who hate regulations that would force them to pat livable wages and not provided substandard products and outlandish interest rates to provide all three.
The first Kenyan-American president (half-white + half-black = all black according to the one drop rule established in Plessy v. Ferguson and centuries of slavery throughout the world), B. H. Obama, a Harvard-trained lawyer, has proven to be a smoocher of corporate ass every bit as much as every "pure" white American president. His top priority was to help businessmen, super-rich ones, who had supped unencumbered at the biggest wealth transfer from the bottom 90% to the top 10% during the Bush administration, after they has destroyed their own nationally funded monopoly game with their own shitty, crooked rules sheparded by Dick Cheney. Obama has done what every other Harvard trained lawyer president has done - he favored big business and the rich while millions more fell into poverty. Who gives a damn about gays getting married when most will have to live on the streets or move back in witht eir parents or live in communes with little or no access to health care?
Integrity is a value the rich can afford to ignore.
why is it that the rest of the First World nations (western europe and japan and canada) all believe that and so have decided some 60 years ago that all of their citizens will be better producers of individual wealth if they collectively care for one another by paying through their taxes for:
1) well-funded public education at the primary, secondary, and university level;
2) universal /national public health insurance wherein no one is denied care although there are reasonable waits for some procedures yet one has the option of paying out of pocket for the same procedure to get it faster;
3) affordable and dependable national/public transportation that connects all to all.
Yet the Republicans are against all of them while the Democrats somehow believe that they can cut a deal with big businesses, who hate regulations that would force them to pat livable wages and not provided substandard products and outlandish interest rates to provide all three.
The first Kenyan-American president (half-white + half-black = all black according to the one drop rule established in Plessy v. Ferguson and centuries of slavery throughout the world), B. H. Obama, a Harvard-trained lawyer, has proven to be a smoocher of corporate ass every bit as much as every "pure" white American president. His top priority was to help businessmen, super-rich ones, who had supped unencumbered at the biggest wealth transfer from the bottom 90% to the top 10% during the Bush administration, after they has destroyed their own nationally funded monopoly game with their own shitty, crooked rules sheparded by Dick Cheney. Obama has done what every other Harvard trained lawyer president has done - he favored big business and the rich while millions more fell into poverty. Who gives a damn about gays getting married when most will have to live on the streets or move back in witht eir parents or live in communes with little or no access to health care?
Integrity is a value the rich can afford to ignore.
