• CLICK HERE To Join Broke Straight Boys & Instantly Get Full Access To Entire Site & 3 FREE bonus sites.

Drake and Ian..

johnny

BSB Addict
Joined
Apr 6, 2013
Posts
6,164
Reaction score
2
Location
San Francisco Ca
Goddam..I sure wish it were me giving Drake that massage. No Matter what anyone say's that boy has a GREAT ASS.
5 for his Ass alone. Never a big Ian fan. Now I hate him. Just kidding. HA HA..I am just jealous.
I Love Drakes Ass. He is a hot fucking guy. Right down to taking that cum in his mouth. And riding till he shot his load.
Holy fucking shit. I thought it was Hot. Can you tell? I even gave Ian a 5. Just wish it were ME. I kid you not.lol
But that is just me.....
 
Now boys and girls that was a very hot scene. A few comments:

1. Great to see Ian back. I guess things are a little slow at the bank - lol!!! His body looked more toned, guess he's hitting the gym more often. This might very well be his best scene ever, and definitely his best topping scene. The massage idea was great and he knew what he was doing. Of course having a body like Drake's to work on wasn't a chore. Loved the rimming and fingering. He fucked well varying his motions and speed. Great job Ian and a well deserved 5.

2. I agree with johnny that Drake can get a 5 just because of his ass. But his total body is hot and I don't care how many sites he's been on prior to Broke Straight Boys, I'm just telling Broke Straight Boys to keep him around for a while. For my taste he overdid the moaning and groaning a bit, but despite that, he too gets a well deserved 5.

3. The scene grade was more difficult for me. It definitely was hot enough to get a 5. But it was a condom scene (and of any recent scene this one cried out for bb) and I usually deduct a point for that. However, sha did say it was the end of a filming week, and I got the impression that this might very well have been a last minute scene brought together especially since Ian is in the area of the studio. And in that case, I know there would not have been enough time to do the proper testing to enable the scene to be bb. So on that presumption, I am giving the scene the 5 it would have gotten had it been a bb scene. Camera work was good, especially shots of the rimming and fingering.

Thanks for a great scene to the guys and everyone involved.
 
I gave it 5's all around. The only thing that would of made the shoot hotter for me is if Ian had slipped this dick into Drake while it was still sticking out of the front of his underwear.
 
Nope...and most of it had to do with the way it was filmed. What a waste of Ian!
 
5's all around but on second thought I SHOULD have given the scene a 4. The condom didn't bother me but the massage didn't get me going. That's just me I guess. I really like Drake I like Ian as well but guess Im just used to seeing him. Don't get me wrong keep him on lots more times. I like the new mature Ian more than ever.
 
Ian's script ideas are like Ian passionless. Not very much chemistry here, nor was there a chance to develop any. Am I wrong to think that scenes that involve a little kissing are always hotter?
Drake is great, always ready willing and able. A bit of Kodi-itis, but he can learn.
 

Welcome tchere1963 to the forum! So are you okay with Drake's "past experiences?"
Yep, Drake's not a newbie to gay4pay; check out his Behind The Scenes interview.
He is a hot guy but I still don't get the whole concept of why he is here. As Johnny always says there are tons of free websites with beautiful boys. This is supposed to be a place where we see new inexperienced guys having gay sex and neither Ian or Drake have anything to do with that concept. I wish Sha or Mark would explain why they are hiring recycled gay porn performers for Broke Straight Boys I'm confused. :001_unsure:
 
Welcome tchere1963 to the forum! So are you okay with Drake's "past experiences?"
Yep, Drake's not a newbie to gay4pay; check out his Behind The Scenes interview.

Ok with it but a little transparency about their past "experiences" might be in order.
 
Ok with it but a little transparency about their past "experiences" might be in order.
While I totally agree with you in principle that Broke Straight Boys is not a place for experienced gay porn actors to do their thing, I do have to say that as Beth stated it was discussed on his behind the scenes and I do believe it was also mentioned during his solo, that this was not his first time at the rodeo.

But much like Amateur Boxing Night in America should not feature pros and American Idol should not have singers who are professionals, Broke Straight Boys should not bring in experienced gay porn actors as this is not the place for them. Blu Media already has a site called College Dudes for cute experienced gay guys to perform, and I do not get the point of having similar performers here where the hook is inexperienced straight guys having gay sex for the first time, here for our entertainment.
 
While I totally agree with you in principle that Broke Straight Boys is not a place for experienced gay porn actors to do their thing, I do have to say that as Beth stated it was discussed on his behind the scenes and I do believe it was also mentioned during his solo, that this was not his first time at the rodeo.

But much like Amateur Boxing Night in America should not feature pros and American Idol should not have singers who are professionals, Broke Straight Boys should not bring in experienced gay porn actors as this is not the place for them. Blu Media already has a site called College Dudes for cute experienced gay guys to perform, and I do not get the point of having similar performers here where the hook is inexperienced straight guys having gay sex for the first time, here for our entertainment.

I understand what your saying and agree. However if we stuck to that premise then a new model should only do a solo, cocksucking and 1 fucking scene then move on. Because after that he's now an experienced model and shouldn't do anymore scenes here. Not like the 20 plus scenes that many of our favorite models did.
 
I understand what your saying and agree. However if we stuck to that premise then a new model should only do a solo, cocksucking and 1 fucking scene then move on. Because after that he's now an experienced model and shouldn't do anymore scenes here. Not like the 20 plus scenes that many of our favorite models did.

Peter (dahling) I posed the very same scenario a not too long ago! (don't remember the thread) I phrased it as a "hypothetical". I believe Mikeyank replied! Maybe he can find the thread? But you and I obviously see this particular point similarly :up:
 
Peter (dahling) I posed the very same scenario a not too long ago! (don't remember the thread) I phrased it as a "hypothetical". I believe Mikeyank replied! Maybe he can find the thread? But you and I obviously see this particular point similarly :up:

Of course Mikeyank replied hence the 9,249 posts lol
 
I guess I will throw my :2c: in on this subject. I was attracted to this site because it is Straight Boys !!! Now we can all discuss the varsity of Kinsey's scale and how straight or gay some guy is sexually. Point being is, would a 0 ( being totally straight ) ever have any form of gay sex, I sort of doubt they would...So what we have on here is a 1 or 2 kind of guy from the scale appear here. That being said, my attraction with this, and I believe most of us is the fact that in our life we have seduced so called straight guys into having some form of gay sex...for most I'm sure it was oral .
So for us personally what we have then is a gay man performing gay sex on a straight guy per-say...Now how many times can that one straight guy come back for sex with a gay guy before he is no longer considered straight, 3, 5, 10, 20 times ???? Do we now move them to a Bi-sexual status ????? I guess what I'm getting at is the PERCEPTION that each of us have in our own sexual being. Personally, and being gay as long as the guy spends over 50% of his time with woman and a Top I consider him straight on the sexual scale..That is my perception, in my life. Personally since I am gay, I see nothing wrong with having gay guys on Broke Straight Boys, but the key to that is that the gay guy must maintain a bottom status for me to maintain that perception.
The one down fall I see with Broke Straight Boys is that some guys that they bring to the site should always be kept as TOP, guys like Ronan Kennedy and Cage Kafig for example, not that they can't perform oral, but some of that sexual perception is lost for me when I see a Ronan Kennedy or a Cage Kafig take a cock up the ass. Not that it wasn't a great sex scene, but that Straight persona is gone. Oh well just my thoughts....
 
Of course Mikeyank replied hence the 9,249 posts lol
And here is number 9,250 my friend.

I understand that any model who appears repeatedly here is not truly straight, but to quote former forumite Abe, (for at least the 1,000th time), I want to watch guys who are "believably straight" to my sensibilities and to my libido.

I can get into a kid who I can believe is straight, who says has never sucked dick and certainly never appeared in a professional gay porn video before, as he explores his sexuality on camera before our eyes. Then it can be very cool to watch him over a period of time as he becomes more proficient in his topping, bottoming or dick sucking skills as he becomes comfortable and actually may enjoy it.

But when a model comes here from numerous other sites, and he has been doing everything for multiple companies in dozens of scenes before we ever meet him in this setting, I have no interest in watching him here, (unless he is paired with a person of interest to me), as there is no progression, no establishing his comfort level. He is just another gay porn actor, and I don't see the point of "introducing" him to us as he is recycled from many sites, as David from BSB1 used to call it, "whoring himself around".

It all seems so simple and so obvious to me, but other people, like Peter, Betu and Stowe and I'm sure others always question my criteria for a hot Broke Straight Boys model. I guess once again it is "different strokes for different folks".
 
I guess I will throw my :2c: in on this subject. I was attracted to this site because it is Straight Boys !!! Now we can all discuss the varsity of Kinsey's scale and how straight or gay some guy is sexually. Point being is, would a 0 ( being totally straight ) ever have any form of gay sex, I sort of doubt they would...So what we have on here is a 1 or 2 kind of guy from the scale appear here. That being said, my attraction with this, and I believe most of us is the fact that in our life we have seduced so called straight guys into having some form of gay sex...for most I'm sure it was oral .
So for us personally what we have then is a gay man performing gay sex on a straight guy per-say...Now how many times can that one straight guy come back for sex with a gay guy before he is no longer considered straight, 3, 5, 10, 20 times ???? Do we now move them to a Bi-sexual status ????? I guess what I'm getting at is the PERCEPTION that each of us have in our own sexual being. Personally, and being gay as long as the guy spends over 50% of his time with woman and a Top I consider him straight on the sexual scale..That is my perception, in my life. Personally since I am gay, I see nothing wrong with having gay guys on Broke Straight Boys, but the key to that is that the gay guy must maintain a bottom status for me to maintain that perception.
The one down fall I see with Broke Straight Boys is that some guys that they bring to the site should always be kept as TOP, guys like Ronan Kennedy and Cage Kafig for example, not that they can't perform oral, but some of that sexual perception is lost for me when I see a Ronan Kennedy or a Cage Kafig take a cock up the ass. Not that it wasn't a great sex scene, but that Straight persona is gone. Oh well just my thoughts....
You and I have very similar thoughts on this subject Rafe!!!!!
 
Of course Mikeyank replied hence the 9,249 posts lol
By now 9249 is so yesterday. I am quite the chatterbox!

th
 
While I can certainly appreciate the whole of what you guys are saying, I personally joined this site to observe "attractive" guys, engage in sex. What caught my attention was that they didn't appear the "typical" twink or overly masculine guys that perform on other sites. There is something very intriguing for me, to see a guy who, from outward appearances, mannerisms etc...doesn't seem like someone who would appear in this type of industry. That being said, I am not swayed one way or the other by their sexual orientation, as long as there is something about them that I find attractive! The fact that the site is called "Broke Straight Boys" is a good title and lures people in looking for that very thing. I spent a while searching for that "non-typical" kind of guy. The Straight part for me best describes the guys presentation. Non effeminate mostly. Some can't help looking less masculine than others, that was not their doing. No more than some women look more masculine than others.

I am just glad that I am able to enjoy the models and the site without too much distraction of "how they appeal to my straight boy" sensibilities. I'm just lucky that way!
 
Top