Did I see it or imagine it?

[ertas23]

A couple of days ago on another forum thread, I dutifully followed Peter's instruction or command - I went through his Shane's (I wanted to challenge him on that matter but now realize I cannot lay any claim to Shane except as one of my top favorites) entire scene portfolio. I kept dreaming of him bottoming (Shane, not Peter) but finally reality set in and I realized that, like Jimmy Johnson (but Shane has personality, more beauty, and consideration for his partner) that he is/was a true top straight boy who would stick to his convictions on that subject. However, I got all excited during one scene. I had just glanced away to grab my water bottle and when my eyes returned to the screen I thought I spotted something. So, back it up, replay, decide I was right so proceeded to slow-mo the video and take screen shots that I could blow up for inspection. I believe I witnessed Shane bare-backing his partner. Now, this might be a long-ago thread on Broke Straight Boys but I am too inexperienced on the forum - and too impatient besides - to go through the search. So, I once again offer up to the senior members of the forum this question: Was this a bare section of a scene that just missed editing? I can find no sheen of latex, there was no latex tip in the slip out and reinsertion, and there was no sign of latex when he exited his partner’s hole with cum on the top and on the hole. Or, do I just have an overactive imagination due to a lack of sleep because of my too many hours viewing all 1000+ videos available and a compulsion to get through them by the holidays?!!! Take a look for yourself. I am going to attempt to place the location of the scene and also insert one or two screen shots. You look, you watch and let me know if I just wanted to see something that isn't there. And, if you've already had this discussion, we need not regurgitate the whole issue - just give me a clue about where to find said old thread because I would love to see (read) what you all thought and in your discussions. (I'm beginning to wonder if my personality includes an aura of pervert... )
http://members.brokestraightboys.com/play/MzAz/shane-&-gino

View attachment 13797

View attachment 13798View attachment 13798

 

[Frontier]

Well something went wrong?

 

[mikeyank]

Shane is actually one of my three favorite models ever, along with Logan and Mike Robbins. I thought I "claimed" Shane first, when either David or Mark posted a picture of him before any of his scenes were ever released. His name Shane means beautiful or pretty in Yiddish and I think he is exactly my type of guy.

Peter has his avatar as mine will always be the Yankees, but I love Shane more as I totally respect guys who will not bottom, like Mike and Jimmy and Shane. All models who have sex with other guys are at least bisexual, but the three I mentioned I consider basically straight but 1's or 2's on the Kinsey scale.

I love David from BSB1, but I am still angry that he forced Shane and Mike to bottom one time each to appease the fans who wanted it. They were both painful scenes for me to watch and especially painful for the boys. This is Shane's bottoming scene which I only watched once and will not watch again as Shane is and should be exclusively a top, but if you want to watch it, here it is:

http://members.brokestraightboys.com/play/Mzcw/lee-&-shane

 

[ertas23]

Shane is actually one of my three favorite models ever, along with Logan and Mike Robbins. I thought I "claimed" Shane first, when either David or Mark posted a picture of him before any of his scenes were ever released. His name Shane means beautiful or pretty in Yiddish and I think he is exactly my type of guy.

Peter has his avatar as mine will always be the Yankees, but I love Shane more as I totally respect guys who will not bottom, like Mike and Jimmy and Shane. All models who have sex with other guys are at least bisexual, but the three I mentioned I consider basically straight but 1's or 2's on the Kinsey scale.

I love David from BSB1, but I am still angry that he forced Shane and Mike to bottom one time each to appease the fans who wanted it. They were both painful scenes for me to watch and especially painful for the boys.

Mike - Your response truly broke my heart. I didn't pull up the pic but I pulled up the site. I read through what David wrote, then I clicked on Lee's name which took me to his own page. The first scene under it was the one you sent (which I took off here cuz I didn't want to resend in response).

I clicked on the second scene - which I had looked at and had written a comment about on 9/1. So, feeling somewhat confused, I went to Shane's site and found I'd not rated it and then realized I had skipped the scene because of it's early placement - months before the scene with Shane, Lee and Damien. I'd assumed that the first scene was Shane letting Lee suck his cock and Shane "teaching" a new model how cock-sucking is done. So, I didn't watch that - I'd seen that type of scene enough - hence, no comment and I had "completed" going through Shane's scenes never knowing he had been coerced to bottom.

As I wrote in the start of this thread, I left Shane's videography believing he had never bottomed - but noting he'd been so much more willing to be an involved scene partner in every scene - unlike JJ.

So, I decided not to watch it. I don't want to see him coerced at any price. I'll leave my image of him as a straight boy who would not be bought. I'm sorry you had to witness it because I can "feel" your disgust with David (who was always on a mission with these guys) and the let down it must have caused Shane to feel toward his own convictions by "doing it for the team". Did Shane leave shortly after doing so?

Boy you know how to let your feelings out there - and they have an affect on the reader.

I wonder if Peter ever watched it.

Tom

 

[gardenboy]

cannot seem to open attachments and, yes Mikeyank, Shane is always one of my favorites - heard he is no a male escort in I believe post said San Fransisco