One of our team members recently made me aware that they have found that Devon appeared on two different sites other than BSB. It appears that this content was filmed very recently and was just made available online. Devon is currently in an exclusive contract with us as many of our models are. This is yet another example of how unfortunately we can't always maintain the exclusivity of our models as many other sites continue to recruit our guys. Of course with an exclusive contract, we could pursue legal action towards the model, but what would that do since the model is indeed "broke".
The dilemma is that another model has broken our trust and he is a highly rated model with our members. BrokeStraightBoys has always been a site where our members feedback does matter. Even though we aren't always able to make every single member happy with our decisions, I ask for your input on the best way to handle this particular situation.
Sha:
Before I express my opinion, I would like to say I was surprised to read that exclusive contracts are offerred to "many of our models". When
Jimmy Johnson was an exclusive model, I and I'm sure most of us thought he was the only one. Same with
Johnny Forza. Is the "many" situation a more recent development?
Now to the issue at hand: A properly executed contract is a valid contract just as much in the porn world as in the real world. Since we here don't know the terms of the contract, but taking the word "exclusive" at its face value, I'm assuming it means in the context of the
Broke Straight Boys's exclusive contract that it states that during the term of the contract the model can not offer his services for free or remuneration to any other porn entity whether it be another website, movie company, webcam site like Flirt for Free. (I don't know if it could cover his own personal skype activities.) If that is how the contract is structured then Devon violated the terms of the contract and should be dismissed. With respect to legal action, unless the contract mandates it, then I would forgo it not because the model is "broke" which I don't think he is but because it would cost you money and why throw good money after bad. However, I would let it be known why he was fired if that is legal; although in the porn business I get the impression that business ethics is not at the top of too many porn companies list of business practices. So I don't know if that would make much difference to them.
And from the non-legal moral aspect, he broke the bond of trust extended to him by
Broke Straight Boys that was given by his word.
To conclude in a succinct manner: He broke the legal contract he executed as well as the moral bond of trust established between
Broke Straight Boys and himself. In the real world he would be let go. Just because this is the porn world doesn't change that. Devon has to learn that actions have consequences. Best he learn that now then when he is a more real world situation where the consequences could be more dire. Dismissing him without pursuing legal action is justice tempered by mercy. To not dismiss him you would be saying that legal contracts don't matter and the principles of "your word is your bond" and "a man is only worth how good his word is" are meaningless. Whether he is hot or hideous cannot and should not influence your decision. We were surviving before he came along, and will continue to do so after he is gone.